IPC / Prototype and Startups
Mhakiki
All prototypes & startupsVerify the claim. Share the evidence.
A fact-checking product for timely, sourced responses to information circulating in Kenya.
Collect public claims from connected feeds or add an original post link.
Trace the source, compare dated evidence and explain what remains uncertain.
Review the finding and return a sourced correction to its platform of origin.
Reviewed fact-checks
Pilot · connections pendingOnly IPC-approved reviews appear here. Each includes evidence, its review date and the original context.
No approved fact-checks yet.
Reviewed claims will appear here with dated evidence and a response linked to their original context.
Social coverage and agent status
No live feed scan or automatic social publishing has been verified yet. The agent can use permitted sources through connected tools; every platform has its own read and write access.
Integration targets · awaiting account connections. A correction can be posted on IPC's account on the original platform, or replied to the source where the connector and platform permit it. X AI reply bots require explicit platform approval.
Review workspace
Develop Mhakiki with IPCChecking workspace access…
Saved claims
Raw claims and drafts are private. An authorised AI agent can save researched drafts through the IPC connection for your review.
Select a saved claim from the inbox to review it.
Response for the original platform
The draft becomes public on the IPC website after your evidence review. Social posting uses a separately authorised account and connector.
Record a response already posted on social media
Review history
Verification standards and corrections
Apply the same standards across political viewpoints. Check specific factual claims, separate opinion and satire, and lead with the evidence rather than allegations about the person posting.
Sources and dates must support the finding. A missing source does not establish that a claim is false. AI-assisted drafts require IPC review, and specialist claims may need expert input.
Fresh evidence can reopen a review. The case returns to draft while the public finding is revised, and its change history is retained. Send new evidence or a correction request to stnicolem@gmail.com.
Method informed by the IFCN principles. IPC does not claim IFCN accreditation.